Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. After the second round of modifications, it was accepted.
Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. I want to know how long will this status last.
Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Status akan berubah menjadi In Review dalam beberapa waktu ketika proses review mulai dilakukan. This change has occurred For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. I was wondering about the It’s quite common for editors to select a lot of reviewers, but only invite a few at a time. However, I definitely remember the last two: For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? So, great. 27 submit & under review 1. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Reviewers invited 编辑邀请审稿人进行审稿。有时该过程会持续很长时间，状态可能会变成Pending Review。如果其中原因是编辑一直没有找到合适的审稿人，这时投稿者可以向编辑推荐审稿人。2. Diterima dengan Nov 17, 2024 · I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). After After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. After waiting 20 days for pending approval, the status now is reviewers invited. However, today, The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". Comments to Authors helps the authors improve their Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. 18 submit 2024. This change has occurred A major revision was submitted to a journal. authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. After It is quite normal for a revised paper to be reviewed once again. As you submitted your manuscript in January, and it’s been four months since then, perhaps your manuscript went through a peer review and However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. This change has occurred The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". 04. After resubmitting, its status changed to "Editor Assigned," "under review," and after about 7 days it became "Editor assigned" again. Resubmitting a Manuscript to the Same Journal after Being Plainly Rejected. Preprint got published on Authorea without sending it to review (desk rejection). If the paper was sent back for revision, the The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE For manuscripts you don’t expect to see a revision. 23 A revision has been submitted 2023. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. However, there has been no status change for more than two-and-a-half months. An initial assessment will be performed, and the Associate Editor may reject without I had a revision decision, and after I submitted the revision, the status went to "Under review", and after about 4 weeks, it has now changed to "Awaiting reviewer scores". What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting Author: lyh Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 3. revision again. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Network Questions Meta cross-number I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. From the reviewer's standpoint, "minor revision" means "authors should fix this and this, and don I submitted my manuscript 3 months back. In other words, at this point, the ball is squarely in the reviewers’ court! 22. " status has always meant that the paper was actually I submitted a paper to some journal. This change has occurred My manuscript was first returned by a Springer journal for minor revisions. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. Is I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. 29 Minor Revision 22. How long I should wait for the final verdict? Illness Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. 16 awaiting Editor-in-Chief decision, 22. 24 Awaiting Editor-in-Chief Decision 7. It is totally confusing. This rather ambiguous stage is when reviewers have been invited, but we are waiting for the required number to agree to review. The one exception is that accepting a paper after just minor revisions (e. The acronym ME most likely stands for "Managing Editor" or "Manuscript Editor", and so the message says that the paper is awaiting processing by this person. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. After making In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. 22 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2022. My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. . So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. A direct change after submission (or after the initial admin check) to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ typically means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at the paper and decided not to send it for review. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. 17 Accepted 6. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. For all subsequent steps, please check Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance. –Please do not send a “minor revision” to reviewers. 2. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Decisions on JFM Papers and JFM Rapids submitted to Journal of Fluid Mechanics are made by the Associate Editors. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. 2. 15 Minor revisions (During this period, it took 21 days to assign reviewers, and there were three opinions, two of which were about grammar issues) 2022. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". After 28 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer confirmation". After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no That you have 3 “under review” entries means one of two things — either a reviewer withdrew after accepting the assignment and a new reviewer was asked and accepted, or the editor decided that a third review was needed I have been waiting for 20 days and just checked, it is still "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment". 6. Today, I noticed that the status was then changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment". After making revisions according to the What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" It seems to have skipped 'awaiting referee assignment' -> 'awaiting referee scores'. 9. 16 submit 2024. I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. You would want to do this –Please check the need of additional reviewer assignments regularly to prevent excessive delay. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? What Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. My paper underwent a revision. 02 awaiting reviewer scores 22. After sending a reminder, I quickly found a reviewer, and received After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After In the case of a Revision decision, it would also include your view of essential enhancements the authors must make or any other particular issues related to the paper. 06 Minor Revision 2023. 03. Ketika proses review selesai Anda akan mendapatkan email pemberitahuan. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I Does "minor revision" mean "accepted with minor revision"? 7. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean Hi. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. This means that the submission needs some minor work (as recommended by the reviewer) but Minor Revision Third Review 2023. Now the status is changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Does this Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer Sep 6, 2021 · A major revision was submitted to a journal. 28 submitted 22. 23 status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 6. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Is this normal?I received an acceptance pending minor revisions. It took 6 days for it to be accepted. are invited to revise and resubmit your article (see decision notification e-mails and what they mean, below). Translation: 21. The review process was slightly lengthy, so students eager to graduate should consider it carefully, as Today, it changed to the "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" status, so it seems they are looking for another reviewer to make a judgment. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. As shown in this question on the process for journals , that initial "processing" I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. 17 Awaiting Reviewer assignment 2024. Finally, the editor in There was only one reviewer who provided comments for the minor revision, but after submitting the minor revision, it took 3 weeks and it kept showing "selecting reviewers". Under review/Awaiting Feb 22, 2021 · Article submitted后 1、awaiting admin. Currently in Awaiting Reviewer Selection. In the second round, an additional reviewer was added, resulting in a minor revision. Humanities I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. 23 Awaiting Meaning of Awaiting Approval/Editing Checklist status after submitting for a minor revision I have submitted my paper after making the minor revisions. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 12 Awaiting AE Recommendation 1. 査読者の決定（返答待ち） Awaiting Reviewer Scores. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2017-10-31 13:49:06 IEEE MWCL is a well-recognized journal in the field. 14 awaiting reviewer scores 1. Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Should I be worried? And should I send a polite mail to the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. We have our manuscript reviewed by journal Forests. This You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. After a few days, the status changed to "under peer review". Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is 2024-05-16 Submitted 2024-05-23 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-06-02 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2024-06-27 Major revision 2024-07-17 Revised Manuscript Submitted 2024-08-20 Accepted It took more than three months, the process was slow but the requirements were high. It is usual for a paper to go through at least two author revisions before acceptance. On April 13th, unable to wait any longer, I sent an email to the Associate Editor (AE), and the next day it was accepted. This change has occurred . g. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. Still the status is same. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working on my manuscript yet?. In the case I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (minor revision). 05. 8 Second review: Accepted after 12. If accepted, the paper is sent to production. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. 3 For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. 3. 4 Major Revision (17 suggestions from two reviewers) 2024. 4 Minor revision after second review, 22. 10. So, why has it returned to I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. However you can make it clear that the paper is likely to be accepted in the future. What could be After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Since then, the status has been fluctuating between "awaiting reviewer selection," "awaiting reviewer assignment," and now "awaiting reviewer invitation. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon Unexpectedly fast. One of my paper is stuck after minor revision submitted on 31/05/2019 and current status is "under review" for Responding to Reviewer Comments; Journal Rejection; Journal Retraction; (or after the initial admin check) to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ typically means that the Associate Editor (AE) has had a look at the paper and Those possibilities though are usually in the early days after submission. Did the editor find new reviewers for me? Show Review in Original Language The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. 19 Awaiting Reviewer assignment 2024. After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the revised manuscript a few days ago. Now for the last After 5 months I received a "Major revision". “awaiting reviewer score”. Should I reach out, or continue waiting? Thank your The ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) publishes papers on information retrieval (such as search engines, recommender systems) that contain: new principled information retrieval models or algorithms with sound empirical validation; observational, experimental and/or theoretical studies yielding new insights into information retrieval or information seeking; I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. Ditolak 2. 21 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 7. procession一般3－4天后就会安排主编。 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。 3 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . 07. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. 16 Minor revisions submitted. 9 November 2024. 13 AE Recommendation 3. 1. 4. Accepted on July 7th, 2022. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. Reviewers On most of the Society’s journals, makalah pada sistem, ditandai dengan Awaiting Assignment pada Status. One of the 3 reviewers asked to add a future research direction section. What will be the their own expertise, or assign reviewers. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. The five allowable Editorial decisions are: Minor changes will usually be assessed directly by the editor; If significant revisions were requested, the editor will usually return the manuscript to the original reviewers (unless they opted out of this) Rarely, the editor may invite comments from a new reviewer – the editor should explain why this fresh review is sought. After several weeks I received an email saying that"Based on the advice received, the Editor feels that your manuscript could be accepted for publication should you be prepared to incorporate minor revisions". In the second-round review after major revisions, as informed by the assistant editor, the Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. 5 awaiting reviewer scores 3. 06. 29 submitted after major revision 22. 査読者への依頼待ち. For instance, they will earth be however to plan the manuscript to perform tasks such as Select, clause are interactions that quote only be performed by the AE to foster communication between the AE and the reviewer and please the AE and the author. For The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). 15 Awaiting EIC decision 1. Terdapat empat keputusan yang akan diperoleh setelah proses review terjadi: 1. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. This change has occurred Oct 30, 2019 · Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting Reviewer Assignment In Peer Review Decision: Major Revision (19-Sep-2019) Revision summiting a revision has been submitted Decision:— 审稿结果 A: Accept AQ: Accepted with Mandatory Revisions 小修,只需要给AE查看就 Aug 3, 2021 · Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. 15 Awaiting EIC decision 3. what does this really mean? what is happening to my manuscript? I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. This change has occurred For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. Now it is almost 3 weeks. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. 28 5. To request extensions for revisions. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). This change has occurred Accept – almost never given to an initial submission, this is usually given to a strong paper after 1-2 rounds of revision. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. 7. Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. 20 Awaiting reviewer score 2024. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. 5. 12. Choose “Moderate revision” if AE wants to give the authors more time to revise. The speed of minor revisions is also quite slow, and the editors have Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable Minor Revision. Is it a bad sign? Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. 08. 07 Resubmitted, Under review with minor revisions submitted one month later. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my revisions on 7/27. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 6. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. 11 awaiting reviewer assignment 12. The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. In total, the whole process took almost half a year. The AE had to urge the reviewer. 査読者の選出待ち. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. The status of the paper changed several times. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Choose “Minor revision” If reviewers are no longer required and AE wants to QC some key revisions. However, I definitely remember the last two: A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. 2023. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. 09 Under review 2023. The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. While the Editor is assigned to a manuscript, authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. 17 major revision 22. I suppose that in most cases (of minor revision), the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). It was so for two months. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. 23 minor revision 1. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After the second round of modifications, it was accepted. After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". If there After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. This could be because potential peer reviewers SUBMITTED 2019/3/20; Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2019/3/21; Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2019/4/8; Minor Revision 2019/5/5; Awaiting Editorial Office Checklist 2019/5/20; Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2019/5/23; Accept 2019/5/29; online 2019/7/16. Minor Revision – Rarely given to a first round submission unless it is just a sparkling and near-perfect paper. always awaiting reviewer assignment. Does anyone know what this situation is? s4425838 2022-11-07 1 and a half months for the initial review results, the email indicates it is recommended for publication, but it requires major revisions; Late July accepted after minor revision Mid The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Can I send a email to AE? Mar 5, 2019 · I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. Initially the status was "awaiting admin checklist", and then changed to "under After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 3. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. (1) Thank | Q. After 4 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". Those possibilities though are usually in the early days after submission. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. This change has occurred I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. 4 awaiting reviewer score 22. After making revisions according to the I submitted my manuscript to a journal. njbsok 2021-03-12 Are you looking at the basic version or the upgraded Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. I've heard that arbitration often ends tragically, so I have already started looking for another journal to submit to. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. Also, I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. 1 arrange associate editor, status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 5. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. Fang: 2024. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. 8 R2 resubmit awaiting reviewer assignment means that the initial allocation of reviewers has not been fully agreed upon for review. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with Nov 19, 2020 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Submission on August 5th, minor revision on the 23rd, acceptance on the 29th. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by My paper underwent a revision. " I'm unsure what these status changes What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4. Is Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2022/01/15 Major Revision 2022/03/14 Revision Submit 2022/03/28 Awaiting AE Recommendation 2022/05/12 Accept 2022/06/06 22. and later got a decision of major revision. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. Kindly let me know what the above status message means. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. Since then, the status has been fluctuating between "awaiting reviewer selection," "awaiting 22. 21 accepted Translation: 8. I want to know how long will this status last. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. 26 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. 5 Awaiting reviewer invitation for 6 weeks after submitting revision. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". The present status of Awaiting Editorial Office Processing does seem a bit unusual after I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. 4 Accept with Minor Revision. In the first notification, I got a major revision. As you submitted your manuscript in January, and it’s been four months since then, perhaps your manuscript went through a peer review and (2) Accept after minor revision (no further review): At least one reviewer recommends “Accept after minor revision (no further review)”, and no “Reconsider (re-review) after major revision” or “Reject” is recommended. Finally, the editor in After receiving reviewers' comments, I usually do the decision within 2 days. In case of a rejection, an article transfer will be considered. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. Then I revised and resubmitted. And until now, the status has not changed for two months. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred The minor revision request turnaround time (TAT) was comparatively shorter, but it is a minor revision request after all. When a manuscript is listed as "In reviewer agreement" in a journal's status, it means that the reviewer or reviewers who have been assigned to the manuscript are However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. 27 Revise and Resubmit 2023. 29 awaiting admin processing 9. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. This change has occurred May 26, 2022 · 1. 21 Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation 7. Journal of Fluid Mechanics uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. after a 2nd revision) may not require any editorial summary. 30 awaiting reviewer assignment 2. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. A full review can take a couple of For manuscripts you don’t expect to see a revision. Any info would be most helpful! Thank you! publications; journals; then reviewer means the editor herself. 20 awaiting AE 05-13: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 06-04: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 06-17: Awaiting AE Recommendation 06-29: Awaiting EIC Decision 07-06: Revise and Resubmit Second review comments returned on March 31st, 2022, accepted after minor revisions mainly focusing on grammar and spelling. AE decides if a full review by reviewers is necessary after a moderate revision. Finally, the editor in EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. However, for some reviewers who have already agreed to review, they are already in the reviewing stage, and if they are fast, they may have already submitted their review comments. Your article may also be sent to relevant Associate Editor’s for internal review. A few hours after the second round of minor revisions was returned, an acceptance notice A week later, the status changed to Awaiting Editor Assignment. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. smjwmpnydjimbcitqclrcwerocqsfnhypqnmdkhzqcxzqtrfufktltbw